![]() |
|
||||||||||||||
|
c:\Websites\foutz237\quodlibet.net\cgi-bin\axs\ax.cgi - working okay - no logging command received - use ?debugme query string for more info. Quodlibet Journal: Volume 6 Number 1, January - March 2004
Our Christian Exile The post-exilic context of Judaism has many
similarities to the place of Christianity in today's secular world. Bishop
Spong (i) has encouraged Christianity to move beyond attachment to forms of
worship to embrace the experience of God, the spirit of God. But the struggle
has yet to begin- it requires a second Reformation that goes beyond theory
& dogma, and politics posing as theological debate.
..
The Second Temple, or
post-exilic era, is a bridge between the glories of the Davidic Kingly line and
the last exile that followed the Roman destruction of the Temple. This period
immediately after the return from captivity is known as the Restoration and
shows the Jewish people struggling to maintain their integrity in the face of
foreign conquest and internal betrayal.iii It is a period which saw changes-
the development of the Oral Law and Rabbinical leadership familiar to us today.
With this came excessive
attachment to Law which was the subject of criticism by Jesus:
Righteousness comes from
inward obedience to the spirit of God and is not a product of attachment to
doctrines, codes of practice or places of worship. In a sense, this agonizing
post-exilic period was a preparation for the dispersion and powerlessness of
future exiles including our own; and the period was, like ours, one of
increasing false divination, prophesy out of imagination where every vision
came to nothing; the Glory of God was not heard or experienced, and His voice
became increasingly distant because people chose not to be receptive.v Therefore, the historical
post-exilic is also a bridge to the coming of the Messiah, Jesus; and our
period today may herald a similar event but not in a form that we expect or
recognize. That is the challenge for Christians- to walk in the footsteps of
Jesus and not fall into error. The Second Temple was rebuilt seventy years
after the destruction of the first Temple- because Judah had forgotten to rest
the land every seventh year, for 490 years. God had collected on behalf of the
land by using an un-expected person, a gentile king, Nebuchadnezzar:
After Restoration, when the
walls around Jerusalem had been finished, two prophets, Nehemiah and Ezra,
instructed the people from the Holy Scriptures reviewing their national history
in detail in a great prayer, where they called upon God as the one who brought
them out of the wilderness in the Exodus; and the Jews made a new covenant with
God, signed and sealed by the priests, nobles, and leaders of the people.vii
But more than this was needed. Following this the Second
temple was finished in the sixth year of the reign of Darius, and would appear
to have been built by decree of three successive kings of Persia, which fact is
significant as the religious direction of the Jews was affected in several
ways. Though the people took
responsibility for the support and upkeep of the Temple with the promise
"We will not neglect the house of our God,"viii the closing chapters
of Nehemiah give us important clues concerning life in Jerusalem- they quickly
fell back to marrying foreign women, despoiling the Temple and not supporting
the priesthood as laid down in the Old Testament. In our secular world today
less and less people subscribe to traditional forms of marriage and our Lord's
Sabbath is used widely to carry out commercial purposes. There is a decline of
support for those carrying out religious tasks. There is a growth in violence
against women and children through the twin pressures of economics and
pornography. In the Davidic, covenantial
period, predating the exile, women had an honoured place in religious
life. One of the features of the
post-exilic period leading into the time of Christ, was the marginalisation of
women from religious life and decision making. The late Second Temple period
had the "women's court" which was considered the least sacred area;
next was the Court of the Israelites (reserved for males); then the Court of
the Priests; and finally the inner sanctum of the Temple itself. The Courts were
laid out in this order to separate the women as far as possible from the
Temple, but generally to give a sense of hierarchy of access to where God was
supposed to dwell. With absolute freeness, the
Spirit of God selects the people He employs without regard for gender.ix These
people in the post-exilic period had forgotten that it was Huldah, the
prophetess, who announced the coming judgment of exile.x Historically, where needed by God, women
played unusual, sometimes pivotal roles as the incident of Rebekah in Genesis
27:1-19 illustrates when she decided that her eldest son, Esau, was not worthy
to receive her husband's inheritance: "Rebekah showed courage
and broke with the established custom...defied the patriarchal system to bring
about what she felt was God's will and God's purpose".xi The Talmud, written during
the post-exile period, only mentions seven prophetesses, six of whom were
pre-exile: Sarah, Miriam, Deborah, Hannah, Abigail, Huldah.xii In my view, this
change in the status of women as co-equal in the worship of God was gradual,
but a significant change from previous Jewish theological practices. Where
women had offered sacrifices and gifts along with men, laws for ceremonial
cleansing in connection with bodily emissions had been the same for both sexes,
and women as well as men consecrated themselves to God as Nazirites. xiii Y'W'H is co-existent
(existing at the same time and one and the same) with Jesus who is the Messiah,
however the Jews did not expect the Messiah to be a carpenter's son born in
manger. But there had been warnings
prior- to show the unexpectedness of the form salvation takes- the Messiah was
predicted to come to Zion on a donkey;xiv Jesus uplifted women once again, and
had women disciples such as Magdalene. In His criticism and cleansing of the
Second Temple, he had in mind the marginalisation of women and gentiles by the
priests.xv With this lack of equality,
the Temple had become "a den of robbers" because such a hierarchy
does not bear fruit.xvi "(As) it
is the same God who activates all of them in everyone",xvii it is not for
mankind, whether they be priests or kings, to circumvent God's sovereignty and
to dictate how he is worshipped, and by whom. In the post exile period,
the Persian religion, Zorastrianism was one of the corrupting influences; and
today its influence is felt through such anti Christian cults as the
Freemasons, Latter Day Saints (Mormons) and Jehovah Witnesses (JWs).xviii In the process of restoring the Jewish faith
and the remnant to the promised land, the influence of this Persian religion
found its way into the religious observances of the Jews in the following,
observable ways: discrimination against women mediums of God's word in
favour of a priestly cast of male
ascetics; emphasis on purification rather than sacrifice, and the battle of
Good with a co-equal Evil.xix Zorastrianism had some
congruence with Judaism with its beliefs in resurrection where the dead arise
at the end,xx monotheism, and strong emphasis on Eschatology involving a final
battle of the Good and Evil elements. But it was not a Y'W'H centered religion,
and therefore was an apostasy; and in many ways is close to a form of Buddhism
popular in the West today where there is an impersonal God who is not involved
in the lives of people. Daniel is the most important
figure in the post exilic period because of his multi-layered
significance- his life span is long and
goes from before the exile to the building of the Second Temple. Interpreter of dreams for Babylonian and
Persian kings, his visions of an apocalyptic end, visions of the glory of God
and his predicting the coming of the Son of Man, make him significant
for this epoch as well. Taken all
together, his writings, or the writings ascribed to him are suggestive of a
schism in Judaic society- the righteous from the unrighteous. "(Daniel is) concerned with the formation of a
conventicle-type force, which is still connected with the empirical Israel but
which desires to be considered as the true Israel, separated by the
resurrection from the rest of the world..."xxi This schism continues today
and has lead to great interest by many Christians in the LaHaye xxii series of
'End Times' books where the line between politics and religion becomes blurred.
Where-in people are not encouraged to live in-the-moment with God and deal with
problems such as injustice and inequality. During the post-exilic
period, Ezekiel had visions of the glory of God comparing that to the dross
that was around him. He stressed that generation taking responsibility for the
consequences of its actions- the sour grapes were not eaten by the parents but
by the present generation; 'the east wind" will come and destroy the
pompous plans and devices of mankind;
his challenge to the people of Israel was to make the dry bones of the
empty, religious rhetoric of the times come alive in the spirit of the Lord of
Hosts.xxiii In summary, the historical
forces at work in the post-exilic period stripped the Jews of statehood and had
made it difficult to practice a religion related to the centrality of
Zion. Being a vassal state after the
return made compromise inevitable. To quote Spong, the Jewish
God in the post-exilic period "as
a theistic, supernatural, parent figure in the sky was finally rendered no
longer operative".xxiv That was probably a good thing. The rebuilding of
the Temple did not succeed in galvanizing Jewish society because "(as a) cultic centre (the new Temple)
combined loyalty to Persian rule with loyalty to the faith which had been
handed down...".xxv The same applies today with a tendency for large
structures of worship for our churches, and congregations who would mainly
cross to the other side of the road if they saw a person lying prostrate. But in the post-exilic
period, Malachi the prophet wrote "I the Lord do not change" xxvi
which as we Christians living in a similar spiritual exile, can take comfort
from. But we must look towards renewal that comes from inner righteousness in
the certainty that to seek God we must look in the unexpected places. Can these
bones live? They certainly can by embracing the brother or sister we are minded
to reject. Bibliography
Batten,
Loring: The Books of Ezra & Nehemiah (Clark, Edinburgh 1913) Bright,
John A: History of Israel (London: SCM Press, 1972), Coggins,
R J: Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi (OTG, Sheffield: JSOT, 1987) Edersheim,
Alfred: Josiah: From the Decline of
the Two Kingdoms to the Assyrian and Babylonian Captivity Philologos Religious
Online Books, www.Philologos.org accessed
October 2002. Goldwurm,
Rabbi Hersh: History of the Jewish
People: The Second Temple Era, (Artscroll History Series, Mesorah Publications.
Ltd., Brooklyn, 1982) Jahanian,
Daryoush: The Zoroastrian-Biblical Connections Influence of Zoroastrianism in
Other Religions http://www.zarathushtra.com/z/article/biblicalconnection.htm
accessed October 2002. Foster,
R S: The Restoration of Israel (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1970) LaHay,
Tim & Jerry Jenkins: The Remnant, (Tyndale House Ill. 2002) LaSor,
W.S., Hubbard, D.A. & Bush, F.W: Old Testament Survey (Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans, 1982) Ploger,
Otto: Theocracy and Eschatology trans.
S Rudman (Basil Blackwell Oxford 1968) von
Rad, Gerhard: Old Testament Theology- Israel's Prophetic Traditions (Edinburgh
: Oliver & Boyd, 1965) Vol.1 Sadler,
Rev. Neal: "Women of the Old Testament: Sarah and Rebekah" Sermon
(St. Matthew United Church of Christ, Wheaton, Illinois, 12/9/1999) http://www.stmatthew-ucc.org/sermon-SarahandRebekah.html
accessed October 2002. Spong,
Bishop John: Why Christianity Must Change or Die, (Harper Collins USA 1998) Zacharias, Dr. Ravi:
Ichabod: Where is the Glory? audio tape (RZIM 2476 Argentia Rd, Suite 203,
Mississauga Ontario, Canada 1986) Endnotes i Spong, Bishop John: Why
Christianity Must Change or Die, (Harper Collins USA 1998) ii Ezekiel 34:3 iii
Goldwurm: History of the Jewish People: The Second Temple Era, (Artscroll
History Series, Mesorah Publications. Ltd., Brooklyn, 1982) iv Matthew 23:3 &4 v Ez.12:24, 13:2 & 12:22 vi 2 Chron. 36:20-21 vii 12 Nehemiah 9:6-38 &
10 viii Neh. 10:32-39 ix Joel 2:28 x 2 Kings 22:14-20 xi Sadler, Rev. Neal:
"Women of the Old Testament: Sarah and Rebekah"(St. Matthew United
Church of Christ, Wheaton, Illinois, 12/9/1999) xii Ibid xiii Leviticus 12:6, 15: 16
&19. Numbers 6:2 xiv Zech. 9:9 xv Matthew 21:13ff xvi Matt 21:19 xvii 1 Cor 12:6 xviii These two latter
religions deny the divinity of Christ as one and the same as Y'W'H and there is
evidence in that in practices, symbols and personnel the Mormons and JWs derive
from Freemasonary: see http://www.jesus-witnesses.com, and www.angelfire.com/ms/seanie/jehov.html xix In Zoroastrian dualism
Ahura Mazda is supreme and communication between Mazda and humans is only by a
select few : Jahanian, Daryoush "The Zoroastrian-Biblical Connections
Influence of Zoroastrianism in Other Religions." xx Compare the Zoroastrian
Resurrection (Rastakhiz) or the end of the world, when the dead revive and the
new world will have a fresh life and new beginning, with Daniel 12:2-13 who
refers to "rising after death" and receiving rewards. In Isaiah
26:19, the dead will rise again from the graves, the ground will give birth to
the dead. xxi Ploger: Theocracy and
Eschatology trans. S Rudman, (Basil
Blackwell Oxford 1968)p22 xxii See LaHay, Tim &
Jerry Jenkins: The Remnant, (Tyndale House Ill. 2002) xxiii Ezekiel 18:2, 27:26
& 27, 37:4. xxiv Spong: Why Christianity
Must Change or Die, p40 xxv Ploger: Theocracy and
Eschatology trans. S Rudman, p33 xxvi Malachi 2:6
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Chicago-North Shore Therapy | sarudama.com | sarudama.com/movies